Innovation is the ultimate business advantage. It enables you to do more with less. In our experience, we’ve found that a methodology called Design Thinking helps to drive innovation. It develops empathy, transcends innate biases, and evolves to better sustainable solutions.
Design Thinking is a collaborative framework used by designers to solve complex problems. It puts humans and their needs at the forefront. It’s solution-focused and action-oriented. In other words: it ensures that you’re solving the right problems and your technology is improving the lives of those that use it––rather than frustrating them.
In Design Thinking, research is a critical ingredient at every step in the process:
Case 1: Driving adoption at the U.S. Department of Labor
Rather than converting a paper form to a digital one, we used Experience Research and Design Thinking to create a new human-centric solution for managing workers’ compensation claims. Putting customers first resulted in a solution that had high adoption rates and superior user satisfaction scores.
Case 2: Re-envisioning sales processes at scale
We worked with a large-scale e-commerce and cloud provider to introduce Design Thinking principles. These were shared throughout their organization and transformed their sales process to quickly build trust with customers through incremental value.
Case 3: Driving compliance in financial services with a mobile-first solution
We worked with a large financial services provider to create a mobile-first compliance solution. By applying Design Thinking principles, we enabled the company to achieve internal compliance on submissions for all of their employees on the very first try.
The research process can be summarized as an iterative three-step process:
The first step of planning is to identify objectives. Common objectives for research are:
After objectives have been identified, the specific research methods should be evaluated. Beyond the types of research objectives, the relevant research methods will depend upon several factors including:
Based on the answers to these questions, the available research methods can be examined. The Nielsen Norman Group has published a useful guide on matching research methods across the dimensions of:
In practice, while many organizations would like to include a significant quantitative aspect to their research, they often lack the resources necessary to do so.